Language and Gesture: Lexical gestures and lexical access: a process model

By Robert M. Krauss, Yihsiu Chen, R. Gottesman. 2000

495 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06e4b2e31de14de8db2560dd33a4b73d29ba38d3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Martha W. Alibali
2. Autumn B. Hostetter
3. Sotaro Kita
4. Mitchell J. Nathan
5. Asli Ozyurek
6. Alissa Melinger
7. Thomas Stephen Davies
8. J. Gerwing

In Language and Linguistics

1. Martha W. Alibali
2. Autumn B. Hostetter
3. Asli Ozyurek
4. Sotaro Kita
5. Alissa Melinger
6. J. Gerwing
7. Janet Beavin Bavelas
8. Thomas Stephen Davies

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Sotaro Kita
2. Martha W. Alibali
3. Autumn B. Hostetter
4. Asli Ozyurek
5. Mitchell J. Nathan
6. Thomas Stephen Davies
7. Alissa Melinger
8. Janet Beavin Bavelas

Citations in the corpus

• Gesture in Spatial Cognition: Expressing, Communicating, and Thinking About Spatial Information (2005, methodology): “Krauss, Chen, and Gottesman (2000) also argue that representational gestures derive from spatial (or other non-propositional) representations of concepts.”
• Competing conceptual representations trigger co-speech representational gestures (2009, background): “It is difficult to accommodate the current results within the account based on the theory that gesture facilitates access to the syntactic or phonological lexical representation (Lexical Retrieval Hypothesis; Krauss et al., 1996, 2000) as essentially the same set of words were used at a comparable r”
• Embodiment in Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Evidence From Learners' and Teachers' Gestures (2012, background): “Many experiments have suggested that representational gestures facilitate thinking or speaking, for example by focusing speakers' attention on perceptual information ( Alibali & Kita, 2010 ), by helping speakers to package ideas into units suitable for speaking ( Kita, 2000 ; Kita & Davies, 2009 ),”
• What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking (2003, methodology): “Other models of speech and gesture production in the literature, such as those by de Ruiter (1998, 2000) and Krauss et al. (2000), have also built upon Levelt s model.”
• Do Speakers Design Their Cospeech Gestures for Their Addressees? The Effects of Addressee Location on Representational Gestures (2002, methodology): “Specifica according to Krauss et al. (1996; 2000), gestu help speakers retrieve words from lexical me ory by cross-modal priming, especially in cas of retrieval difficulty.”
• Gesturing on the telephone: Independent effects of dialogue and visibility. (2008, background): “It is also limited to predicting effects on frequency or rate measures, and we agree with Krauss, Chen, and Gottesman (2000,, p. 261) that why different gestures take the particular physical form they do is one of the most important yet largely unaddressed questions in gesture research.”
• I see it in my hands’ eye: Representational gestures reflect conceptual demands (2007, result): “This hypothesis differs from another widely cited hypothesis about the role of gestures in speech production, namely the Lexical Access Hypothesis (Chawla & Krauss, 1994 ; Krauss, Chen, & Gottesman, 2001 ; Rauscher, Krauss, & Chen, 1996 ).”
• Gesture and the communicative intention of the speaker (2005, background): “…1989) then distributes the information between modalities, sending information to be expressed propositionally to the message generator and information to be expressed manually to the sketch generator (de Ruiter, 2000), motor planner (Krauss et al., 2000) or other gesture generating component.”
• Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action (2008, methodology): “In contrast, the lexical gesture process model (Krauss et al., 2000) holds that gestures should not be considered part of the speaker’s communicative intention.”
• Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review (2009, background): “Because such gestures were often not visible to the addressee, and they tended to appear immediately before or with the description of a left-turn, Kita and Essegbey (2001) suggested that such left-hand gestures may be triggered by cognitive needs to facilitate the speech production when verbally ex”