Do players correctly estimate what others do?: Evidence of conservatism in beliefs

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Overconfidence in Forecasts of Own Performance: An Experimental Study (2009, unknown): “…to elicit subjects' beliefs about the choices of other subjects or their types (Sonnemans, Schram and Offerman (1998), Morrison and Rutstrom (2000), Huck and Weizsacker (2002), Nyarko and Schotter (2002)), or to elicit probabilities in the context of Bayesian inference (McKelvey and Page (1990),…”
Belief Elicitation: A Horse Race Among Truth Serums (2015, unknown): “Huck and Weizsäcker (2002) compare the quadratic scoring rule and outcome matching.”
A penny for your thoughts: a survey of methods for eliciting beliefs (2014, unknown): “A method that embodies advances in both these fields is the elicitation of intervals around empirical frequencies as in Hurley and Shogren (2005), elaborated in Section 2.”
The Self-Fulfilling Property of Trust: An Experimental Study (2007, methodology): “Statements were paid according to the commonly used quadratic scoring rule (e.g., Huck and Weizsäcker 2002), and guesses according to a triangular scheme19.”
Institution formation in public goods games (2006, background): “(1998), Huck and Weizsäcker (2002), and Nyarko and Schotter (2002).”