A penny for your thoughts: a survey of methods for eliciting beliefs

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry (2020, result): “Although the two studies also differ on other aspects – most notably the relative quality of the human and the AI poems – previous research corroborates the claim that incentives indeed lead to more precise confidence ratings (Schlag, Tremewan, & van der Weele, 2015).”
Good news and bad news are still news: experimental evidence on belief updating (2019, unknown): “See Schlag et al. (2014) for details about earlier descriptions of this mechanism. The mechanism is also referred to in various papers as the “crossover method”, “matching probabilities”, and “reservation probabilities”. (7)While this method is a variant of the Becker-Degroot-Marschak (BDM) mechanis”