MICROBIAL PHYTASE IN POULTRY NUTRITION
By P. Selle, V. Ravindran. 2007
790 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Animal Science and Zoology, Hematology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05a470b97284e734a8ffbc5c971556030ef8ec48
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Animal Science and Zoology
In Hematology
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Feed enzymes: The science, practice, and metabolic realities (2013, background): “There is evidence to suggest that preparations with multiple enzyme activities may provide a competitive strategy to improve nutrient utilization in poultry diets [10, 11].”
- Microbial Enzymes: Tools for Biotechnological Processes (2014, background): “available are phytases, proteases, α-galactosidases, glucanases, xylanases, α-amylases, and polygalacturonases, mainly used for swine and poultry [133].”
- Review: Supplementation of phytase and carbohydrases to diets for poultry (2011, methodology): “…lycii and Escherichia coli derived phytases, the most commonly utilized microbial phytses (Lei and Stahl 2001; Greiner and Konietzny 2006; Selle and Ravindran 2007), ranges from 2.0 to 5.5 (Table 2), which is closer to the physiological pH (2 to 5) of the pro-ventriculus and ventriculus…”
- Implications of sorghum in broiler chicken nutrition (2010, background): “The capacity of phytate to drag Na into the gut lumen and phytase to counteract this depletion has led to the suggestion that phytate and phytase impact on intestinal uptakes of amino acids and other nutrients because Na-dependent transport systems and the activity of Na+-K+-ATPase or the ‘sodium pu”
- The effect of phytase and carbohydrase on ileal amino acid digestibility in monogastric diets: complimentary mode of action? (2009, methodology): “Interestingly when the percentage improvement with phytase for IAAD is correlated with control IAAD, the R2 is 0.94 for TiO2/AIA studies but only 0.48 for CrO2 studies and the control IAAD is substantially higher when CrO2 is used (Selle and Ravindran, 2007a).”
- Phytate-degrading enzymes in pig nutrition (2008, background): “consistently enhance energy utilisation in poultry (Selle and Ravindran, 2007).”
- Phytate and microbial phytase: implications for endogenous nitrogen losses and nutrient availability (2009, background): “Selle and Ravindran (2007) recently published a review, which concluded that energy and amino acid matrices for phytases are justified, though more fundamental research to elucidate mechanisms of action and quantification of effect is warranted.”
- Application of microbial phytase in fish feed (2007, background): “26) commences at position C6 of the myo-inositol hexaphosphate ring [13].”
- Alternatives to antibiotics for maximizing growth performance and feed efficiency in poultry: a review (2017, background): “enzymes in improving the growth and feed efficiency in poultry is well documented and reviewed (Bedford and Schulze, 1998; Choct, 2006; Selle and Ravindran, 2007; Adeola and Cowieson, 2011; Slominski, 2011; Woyengo and Nyachoti, 2011).”
- BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: opportunities and challenges in using exogenous enzymes to improve nonruminant animal production. (2011, background): “This effect is both the most economically significant in terms of diet cost reduction but is also, unfortunately, the most variable (Selle and Ravindran, 2007).”