Socially desirable response sets: The impact of country culture.

By Karen L. Middleton, J. L. Jones. 2000

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Affective semantic space of scents. Towards a universal scale to measure self-reported odor-related feelings (2013, unknown): “…in Western cultures versus interdependent or collectivist in Eastern cultures, Markus & Kitayama, 1991; higher sensitivity to social desirability in Eastern cultures; Middleton & Jones, 2000; stronger self-regulation of negative emotions in Eastern cultures: Markus & Kitayama, 1991).”
Interviewers' perceptions of impression management in employment interviews (2014, background): “Also, do dyads where applicant and interviewer have different cultural backgrounds converge less in their perceptions? People from different cultures may differ in how they perceive and use IM (Schermerhorn and Bond, 1991; Zaidman and Drory, 2001; Middleton and Jones, 2000) or deception (Lewis and G”
Validity of the SDS-17 measure of social desirability in the American context (2006, background): “Responses that convey a favorable impression in one society do not necessarily do so in another (e.g., Middleton & Jones, 2000; Smith, Smith, & Seymour, 1993), and validation may not transfer directly across nations (cf. Van de Vijver, 2003).”