Assessing Critical Thinking in the Writing of Japanese University Students
By Paul Stapleton. 2001
201 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04de605d1f4ed42fb7dd3568f07d2bbaa6681fd2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Education
Citations in the corpus
- Critical thinking, questioning and student engagement in Korean university English courses (2015, background): “…a t S s 3 b g a F p r t c c r m s ( 2 e i p l Despite some limitations, these survey results and FGD responses align with the research discussed above that insists T can be successful in an East Asian context (Davidson & Dunham, 1997; Riasati & Mollaei, 2012; Shin & Crookes, 2005; tapleton, 2001).”
- Critical Argument and Writer Identity: Social Constructivism as a Theoretical Framework for EFL Academic Writing (2014, background): “To further support this, in a study at a Japanese university, Stapleton (2001) established that the ability for Japanese EFL students to engage critical thinking in their writing may be hindered or misunderstood by Western assessors due a lack of the students’ familiarity with assigned writing…”
- Critical thinking and Chinese university students: a review of the evidence (2011, background): “Further, if indirect, support comes from Stapleton (2001), who analysed Japanese (rather than Chinese) university students’ written assignments.”