From Text to Codings: Intercoder Reliability Assessment in Qualitative Content Analysis

606 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Beyond a coefficient: an interactive process for achieving inter-rater consistency in qualitative coding (2020, background): “What we reached in the end was not only a way to communicate consistency in our coding that did not hinge on a certain quantifiable level, but also a justifiable way to engage in single-coding the remaining data in a time- and costeffective manner (Burla et al., 2008; Saldaña, 2016).”
Qualitative Content Analysis (2014, methodology): “It is recommended that the analysis be performed by more than one person to increase the comprehensivity and provide sound interpretation of the data (Burla et al., 2008; Schreier, 2012).”
Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines (2020, background): “This is important when data coding is distributed across multiple researchers, as large projects frequently necessitate (Burla et al., 2008; MacPhail et al., 2016).”
Coding In-depth Semistructured Interviews (2013, background): “Others have argued that during the deployment stage, high values of intercoder reliability justify the choice for one rather than two or more coders using one set of codes (Burla et al. 2008:116; Dunn 1989:37).”