What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it?

By Oliver Wilhelm, Andrea Hildebrandt, Klaus Oberauer. 2013

432 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A latent variable study examined whether different classes of working-memory tasks measure the same general construct of working-memory capacity (WMC). Data from 270 subjects were used to examine the relationship between Binding, Updating, Recall-N-back, and Complex Span tasks, and the relations of WMC with secondary memory measures, indicators of cognitive control from two response-conflict paradigms (Simon task and Eriksen flanker task), and fluid intelligence. Confirmatory factor analyses support the concept of a general WMC factor. Results from structural-equation modeling show negligible relations of WMC with response-conflict resolution, and very strong relations of WMC with secondary memory and fluid intelligence. The findings support the hypothesis that individual differences in WMC reflect the ability to build, maintain and update arbitrary bindings.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. J. Urgen Schmidhuber
  2. Sjoerd van Steenkiste
  3. Klaus Greff
  4. Stephan Lewandowsky
  5. Ullrich K. H. Ecker
  6. Tal Yarkoni
  7. Klaus Oberauer
  8. Russell A. Poldrack

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

  1. Catherine McBride
  2. Xiujie Yang
  3. Stephan Lewandowsky
  4. Ullrich K. H. Ecker
  5. Klaus Oberauer
  6. J. Urgen Schmidhuber
  7. Russell A. Poldrack
  8. Kevin Kien-Hoa Chung

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Stephan Lewandowsky
  2. Ullrich K. H. Ecker
  3. J. Urgen Schmidhuber
  4. Russell A. Poldrack
  5. Kevin Kien-Hoa Chung
  6. Tal Yarkoni
  7. Klaus Oberauer
  8. Catherine McBride

Citations in the corpus