Andrea Hildebrandt

Experimental and Cognitive Psychology · 2013–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 12 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Andrea Hildebrandt trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. M. Kane
  2. Akira Miyake
  3. Klaus Oberauer
  4. Naomi P. Friedman
  5. Andrew R. A. Conway
  6. R. Engle
  7. Nash Unsworth
  8. Oliver Wilhelm
  9. S. van Buuren
  10. Scott Barry Kaufman

Papers from Andrea Hildebrandt's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Andrea Hildebrandt trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The generality of working memory capacity: a latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. (Journal of experimental psychology. General)
  2. Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. (Journal of experimental psychology. General)
  3. The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis. (Cognitive Psychology)
  4. Working memory and intelligence: the same or different constructs? (Psychological bulletin)
  5. On the division of short-term and working memory: an examination of simple and complex span and their relation to higher order abilities. (Psychological bulletin)
  6. Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review)
  7. Executive Attention, Working Memory Capacity, and a Two-Factor Theory of Cognitive Control.
  8. The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. (Psychology Review)
  9. The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions (Current Directions in Psychological Science)
  10. Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. (Journal of experimental psychology. General)

Their papers