Cost-Based Anticipatory Action Selection for Human–Robot Fluency
By Guy Hoffman, Cynthia Lynn Breazeal. 2007
193 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Julie Arnold Shah
- Przemyslaw A. Lasota
- T. Fong
- Brian Charles Williams
- James Wiken
- Guy Hoffman
- Cynthia Lynn Breazeal
- Lars Karlsson
In Social Psychology
- Julie Arnold Shah
- Przemyslaw A. Lasota
- Guy Hoffman
- T. Fong
- Anca Dragan
- Maja J. Mataric
- Siddhartha S. Srinivasa
- Aaron St. Clair
Citations in the corpus
- Plan explicability and predictability for robot task planning (2015, background): “Our problem settings are as follows: an intelligent agent is given a goal by a human (so that the human knows the goal of the agent) working in the same environment and it needs to synthesize a plan to achieve the goal.”
- How Robot Verbal Feedback Can Improve Team Performance in Human-Robot Task Collaborations (2015, background): “This prior work has demonstrated that robots that account for the actions of their collaborators when deciding what to do are preferred and perceived as more intelligent [17] and that anticipatory action can play an important role in increasing team fluency [8].”
- Improved human-robot team performance using Chaski, A human-inspired plan execution system (2011, methodology): “These results are surprising considering previously reported results [ 8 ] that anticipatory action within a humanrobot team positively impacted these subjective measures.”
- Evaluating Fluency in Human–Robot Collaboration (2019, background): “Three of them were originally proposed in [5]: the percentage of concurrent activity (C-ACT), the human’s idle time (H-IDLE), and the robot’s functional delay (F-DEL).”
- Toward seamless human-robot handovers (2013, background): “Another work on human–robot collaboration is relevant for our work as it establishes metrics of interaction fluency, which can be used in measuring the success of handovers (Hoffman & Breazeal, 2007).”
- A Survey of Methods for Safe Human-Robot Interaction (2017, methodology): “A framework developed by Hoffman and Breazeal (2007) utilizes a cost-based Markov process to anticipate human actions and select actions based on the robot’s confidence in the validity of the prediction and risk. In this context, a “risky” robot action is one that could result in a significant waste”
- Human-aware task planning for mobile robots (2009, background): “As noted by Hoffman and Breazeal [17], [18], cooperation between robots and humans can be greatly improved if the robots can predict the actions of the humans.”