Research synthesis and meta‐analysis

By J. Norris, L. Ortega, Luke Plonsky. 2012

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01c87a48c9853834acb78d38eb5b29609716a59b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Methods for dealing with multiple outcomes in meta-analysis: a comparison between averaging effect sizes, robust variance estimation and multilevel meta-analysis (2017, background): “Not only within, but also between studies, there might be dependence (Cooper, 2010).”
Systematicity in Organizational Research Literature Reviews: A Framework and Assessment (2021, background): “We limited our scope to the period from 2008 to 2018 because several pieces aimed at enhancing review rigor and relevance were published around 2008 (e.g., Cooper et al. 2009; Cropanzano, 2009; Denyer & Tranfield, 2009; Liberati et al., 2009; Rousseau et al., 2008).”
Problems (and solutions) in the measurement of policy diffusion mechanisms (2015, methodology): “Meta-analyses are essential for taking stock of previous research, producing cumulative knowledge and developing a progressive research programme (Lipsey and Wilson 2000; Cooper et al. 2009a, 2009b; Borenstein et al. 2011).”
A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Bullying Prevention Programs' Effects on Bystander Intervention Behavior (2012, methodology): “Cooper (2010) discussed several occurrences that constitute nonindependence and their effects on subsequent findings.”
A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Enrichment Programs on Gifted Students (2016, methodology): “If a single study contained more than one effect size, the average of these results was calculated to represent the study (Cooper, 2010).”
An empirical review of anonymity effects in peer assessment, peer feedback, peer review, peer evaluation and peer grading (2019, methodology): “Third, in addition to the in-depth analysis of the results, for the second research question we used vote counting which is a technique with limitations when extracting conclusions as compared with stronger methods - i.e., meta-analysis (Cooper, 2010 p. 157-158).”
Small-Sample Adjustments for Tests of Moderators and Model Fit Using Robust Variance Estimation in Meta-Regression (2015, background): “When such moderator relationships are of interest, some analysts apply a ‘‘shifting unit of analysis’’ approach (Cooper, 2010), wherein effect sizes within a study are aggregated only if they have the same value of a categorical moderator.”
The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis (2016, methodology): “Finally, SPSS was used to analyse relationships between potential moderator variables and each of the effect sizes separately (Cooper, 2010; Plonsky & Oswald, 2012).”
A Meta-Analysis of Morphological Interventions in English: Effects on Literacy Outcomes for School-Age Children (2013, methodology): “We calculate a variance-weighted overall effect size that adjusts for differences in within-sample sizes (Cooper, 2009; Cooper, Hedges, & Valentine, 2009; Hedges & Olkin, 1985).”
The Evidence Base for Mental Health Consultation in Early Childhood Settings: A Research Synthesis Addressing Children's Behavioral Outcomes (2010, methodology): “Our comprehensive search of the literature on the effects of mental health consultation in early childhood settings was carried out using established research synthesis methodology (Cook et al., 1992; Cooper & Lindsay, 1998; Mullen & Ramírez, 2006).”