A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Bullying Prevention Programs' Effects on Bystander Intervention Behavior

660 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Defining and measuring youth digital citizenship (2016, background): “Efforts to enhance the role of bystanders (Davis and Nixon, 2012; Nickerson et al., 2014; Polanin et al., 2012) and influence social norms (Jones et al., 2011; Perkins et al., 2011; Salmivalli and Voeten, 2004) are increasingly a focus of programs to reduce bullying.”
The Role of Teachers in Bullying: The Relation between Antibullying Attitudes, Efficacy, and Efforts to Reduce Bullying. (2014, background): “The social context of bullies and victims has increasingly been the target of antibullying interventions (Polanin et al., 2012; Smith -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 -1 SD +1SD Pe er -”
Participant Roles in Bullying: How Can Peer Bystanders Be Utilized in Interventions? (2014, background): “Polanin, Espelage, and Pigott (2012) identified 12 studies evaluating the effects of schoolbased programs that focused on increasing bystander intervention (e.g., Creating a Peaceful School Learning Environment, Expect Respect, Kiusaamista Vastaan [Against Bullying; KiVa] antibullying program,…”