Situation-Behavior Profiles as a Locus of Consistency in Personality

By Walter Mischel, Y. Shoda, Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton. 2002

280 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/00dd73fbfad9ae3f16d996d6b424557c4faafcd8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Reeshad S. Dalal
2. Rustin D. Meyer
3. Alessandro Iorio
4. Jens B. Asendorpf
5. J. Call
6. Marco Tortoriello
7. J. Uher
8. J. Gillespie

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Eli Tsukayama
2. Betty Kim
3. Alessandro Iorio
4. Jens B. Asendorpf
5. J. Call
6. Reeshad S. Dalal
7. Marco Tortoriello
8. J. Uher

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

1. Alessandro Iorio
2. Reeshad S. Dalal
3. Marco Tortoriello
4. P. Bryant
5. Giuseppe Soda
6. K. Locke

Citations in the corpus

• Harvesting Value from Brokerage: Individual Strategic Orientation, Structural Holes, and Performance (2017, methodology): “By incorporating the situation into the search for consistency of behaviors, individuals can be “characterized not only by stable individual differences in their overall levels of behavior, but also by distinctive and stable patterns of situation–behavior relations” (Mischel et al., 2002: 51).”
• Personality Strength and Situational Influences on Behavior (2015, background): “” situation–behavior profiles (Mischel et al., 2002) may benefit weak personalities (Gibbons & Rupp, 2009).”
• A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. (2005, background): “For instance, Powers’s (1973) control theory model incorporates 11 distinct goal levels; Newell’s (1990) model of cognition incorporates four levels (social, rational, cognitive, and biological); Cropanzano, James, and Citera’s (1993) hierarchical model uses four levels (values, self-identities, per”
• Within-individual variability in self-concepts and personality states: Applying density distribution and situation-behavior approaches across cultures (2013, methodology): “We applied both density distribution (Fleeson, 2001) and if–then situation-behavior (Mischel et al., 2002) approaches to investigate within-individual variability in personality states.”
• Personality in the behaviour of great apes: temporal stability, cross-situational consistency and coherence in response (2008, background): “…of behaviour scores on a given trait dimension across several trait-relevant situations, or across several observations within the same situation if (and only if) the scores are sufficiently consistent across situations or time (Epstein 1979, 1980; Asendorpf 1988, 1992; Mischel et al. 2002).”