The European Community Household Panel: A review

By Franco Peracchi. 2002

377 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/001518d823d5582ea2ef2a6581c9f490f3ef04e5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Badi H. Baltagi
2. J. I. C. Ruiz
3. P. Profeta
4. P. Böckerman
5. Eliana Viviano
6. P. Ilmakunnas
7. A. Brandolini
8. Edvard Johansson

In General Health Professions

1. Badi H. Baltagi
2. J. I. C. Ruiz
3. P. Profeta
4. P. Böckerman
5. P. Ilmakunnas
6. Eliana Viviano
7. Edvard Johansson
8. A. Brandolini

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Badi H. Baltagi
2. J. I. C. Ruiz
3. P. Profeta
4. Eliana Viviano
5. P. Böckerman
6. P. Ilmakunnas
7. A. Brandolini
8. Edvard Johansson

Citations in the corpus

• Job Security and Employee Well-Being: Evidence from Matched Survey and Register Data (2011, positive): “The paper takes advantage of the European Community Household Panel (ECHP) for Finland, which is available for the period 1996– 2001.3 The Finnish part of ECHP is a representative random sample of 3 Peracchi (2002) provides a description of ECHP.”
• Do Friends and Relatives Really Help in Getting a Good Job? (2010, background): “[30] Peracchi F.”
• Determinants of job satisfaction: a European comparison of self-employed and paid employees (2011, positive): “See Williams (2006) for a complete description of the methodology.”
• Gender Gaps in Unemployment Rates in OECD Countries (2006, neutral): “…this hypothesis we simply modify (1) to Pr (U p 1) p F(b b female b x), (2)0 1 2 where x is a variety of characteristics—age, education, marital status, and 5 For details of the ECHPS, see Peracchi (2002) and Nicoletti and Peracchi (2002), who discuss, among other things, sample attrition.”
• Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (2020, methodology): “The European Community Household Panel (ECHP) is centrally designed and coordinated by the Statistical Office of the European Communities (EuroStat), see Peracchi (2002). The first wave was conducted in 1994 and included all current members of the EU except Austria,”
• Survey response and survey characteristics: microlevel evidence from the European Community Household Panel (2005, background): “Averaging over the seven countries that were considered, we obtain an overall household response rate in the first wave of 76%, which is comparable with that observed in the initial wave of other panel surveys (Peracchi, 2002).”
• The value of an educated population for an individual's entrepreneurship success (2014, neutral): “2 See Peracchi (2002) for a review of the organization of the survey, and a discussion of the issues a researcher may face when using these data.”
• Using job embeddedness factors to explain voluntary turnover in four European countries (2008, background): “Furthe information on the ECHP and discussion on attrition, non response, and weighing procedures can be found in Peracchi (2002).”
• Attrition in Panel Data: The Effectiveness of Weighting (2006, neutral): “For a description of sample and non-sample persons in the ECHP, we refer to Peracchi (2000). 4.”
• Household Incomes and Redistribution in the European Union: Quantifying the Equalising Properties of Taxes and Benefits (2005, neutral): “2 Wagstaff and van Doorslaer (2001), Wagstaff, et al. (1999). Older studies are Berglas (1971), Kakwani (1977), and Zandvakili (1994).”
• Reservation Wages: Explaining Some Puzzling Regional Patterns (2011, neutral): “corresponds to the year 1994 for almost all the countries except Austria and Finland, which joined in 1995 and 1996, respectively) is the one with the largest sample size, because of the large depletion of the ECHP sample due to explicit refusal to respond, failure to follow up the unit, or break-up”