R. Ferrari

Statistics and Probability · 2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 5 researchers and is trusted by 7 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom R. Ferrari trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. David Moher
  2. Lawrence M. Rudner
  3. Marco Pautasso
  4. G. Wong

Who trusts R. Ferrari overall

  1. Junmin Li
  2. Leonie Elizabeth
  3. Matthias Pilz
  4. P. Machado
  5. M. Zinöcker
  6. P. Baker

Papers from R. Ferrari's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers R. Ferrari trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. (Health Information and Libraries Journal)
  2. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (British medical journal)
  3. Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach. (British Journal of Nursing)
  4. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors (Rheumatology International)
  5. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. (Journal Chiropractic Medicine)
  6. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (The FASEB Journal)
  7. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (PLoS Medicine)
  8. CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (PLoS Medicine)
  9. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (British medical journal)
  10. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)

Their papers