Amanda Pallais

Economics and Econometrics · 2015–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 23 researchers and is trusted by 18 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Economics and Econometrics — 31 citations into it; #6,946 of 23,481 by trust here, #10,133 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 25 citations into it; #18,174 of 22,756 by trust here, #14,364 by citations
• Gender Studies — 19 citations into it; #788 of 4,924 by trust here, #922 by citations
• Safety Research — 18 citations into it; #3,352 of 5,829 by trust here, #3,512 by citations
• Education — 12 citations into it
• Demography — 7 citations into it
• General Decision Sciences — 7 citations into it

Whom Amanda Pallais trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. D. Black
2. E. Bettinger
3. James J. Choi
4. O. Bandiera
5. Jeffrey A. Smith
6. David Laibson
7. Bridget Terry Long
8. I. Barankay
9. J. Bound
10. S. Dale

Who trusts Amanda Pallais overall

1. K. Muralidharan
2. Matthew Wiswall
3. Jose Maria Barrero
4. Mauricio Romero
5. Joshua Goodman
6. Hector Chade
7. T. Boeri
8. M. Keith Chen
9. Nicole Maestas
10. Lindsay C. Page

Papers from Amanda Pallais's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Amanda Pallais trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. The returns to individual and college characteristics: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth
2. Estimating the Payoff to Attending a More Selective College: An Application of Selection on Observables and Unobservables
3. Misclassification of the dependent variable in a discrete-response setting
4. Social preferences and the response to incentives: Evidence from personnel data
5. Economics and Identity
6. Matching and Sorting in Online Dating
7. The Effects of Social Networks on Employment and Inequality
8. Gender Differences in Mate Selection: Evidence From a Speed Dating Experiment
9. Who Gets the Job Referral? Evidence from a Social Networks Experiment
10. Estimating the Returns to College Quality with Multiple Proxies for Quality (Journal of Labor Economics)

Their papers

• Valuing Alternative Work Arrangements (2017) — 756 citations
• Why the Referential Treatment? Evidence from Field Experiments on Referrals (2016) — 154 citations
• Small Differences That Matter: Mistakes in Applying to College (2015) — 209 citations
• 'Acting Wife': Marriage Market Incentives and Labor Market Investments (2017) — 207 citations