Carl Bernacchi

Plant Science · 2001–2009

A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 8 researchers and is trusted by 35 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Carl Bernacchi trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. S. von Caemmerer
  2. S. Long
  3. A. Portis
  4. E. Singsaas
  5. C. Pimentel
  6. Alistair Rogers
  7. Elizabeth A. Ainsworth
  8. John R. Evans
  9. K. Asada
  10. M. Salvucci

Who trusts Carl Bernacchi overall

  1. S. Long
  2. T. Sharkey
  3. Jaume Flexas
  4. R. Wise
  5. R. Duursma
  6. E. Singsaas
  7. Stephen M. Schrader
  8. J. Galmés
  9. Xinguang Zhu
  10. D. Ort

Papers from Carl Bernacchi's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Carl Bernacchi trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco‐limited photosynthesis
  2. Biochemical models of leaf photosynthesis.
  3. In vivo temperature response functions of parameters required to model RuBP-limited photosynthesis
  4. Temperature Response of Mesophyll Conductance. Implications for the Determination of Rubisco Enzyme Kinetics and for Limitations to Photosynthesis in Vivo (Plant Physiology)
  5. Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. (Journal of Experimental Botany)
  6. Despite slow catalysis and confused substrate specificity, all ribulose bisphosphate carboxylases may be nearly perfectly optimized. (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  7. Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. I. Seasonal changes in mature maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.)
  8. Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests (Nature)
  9. Response of total night‐time respiration to differences in total daily photosynthesis for leaves in a Quercus rubra L. canopy: implications for modelling canopy CO2 exchange
  10. Direct and indirect effects of elevated CO2 on leaf respiration in a forest ecosystem

Their papers