Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco‐limited photosynthesis

By Carl Bernacchi, E. Singsaas, C. Pimentel, A. Portis, S. Long. 2001

1,288 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bdad1d2a51179047decbf4986d20a265aaf9d8e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. S. Long
2. T. Sharkey
3. R. Duursma
4. Jaume Flexas
5. H. Medrano
6. D. Ort
7. J. Galmés
8. Carl Bernacchi

In Molecular Biology

1. S. Long
2. T. Sharkey
3. D. Ort
4. Carl Bernacchi
5. R. Duursma
6. Xinguang Zhu
7. Jaume Flexas
8. H. Medrano

In Plant Science

1. S. Long
2. T. Sharkey
3. Jaume Flexas
4. H. Medrano
5. R. Duursma
6. D. Ort
7. J. Galmés
8. Carl Bernacchi

Citations in the corpus

• Seasonal patterns of foliar reflectance in relation to photosynthetic capacity and color index in two co-occurring tree species, Quercus rubra and Betula papyrifera (2012, neutral): “Reference values at 25 ◦C with their activation energies and input parameter values are listed in Supplementary Table S1 (Bernacchi et al., 2001; De Pury and Farquhar, 1997; Evans, 1987; Harley et al., 1992; Jones, 1992).”
• Would transformation of C3 crop plants with foreign Rubisco increase productivity? A computational analysis extrapolating from kinetic properties to canopy photosynthesis (2004, methodology): “3 at 25 ∞C (Bernacchi et al. 2001).”
• Temperature dependence of two parameters in a photosynthesis model (2002, background): “(1980) 55389 204839 650 298·2 48270 203549 650 Pinus sylvestris Leuning (unpublished) 65330 0 0 298·2 55000 0 0 Tobacco Bernacchi et al. (2001) 88434 199390 656 293·2 65649 195860 643 dagl Wohlfahrt et al. (1999) 2 149061 198000 656 293·2 78754 200000 643 kopy (Monte Bodone) 61304 202538 656 293·2 4”
• A global scale mechanistic model of photosynthetic capacity (LUNA V1.0) (2016, background): “The temperature dependence of Rubisco kinetic parame- ters (Kc, Ko, τ) and mitochondrial respiration in light (Rd) (Farquhar et al., 1980) is an Arrhenius function taken from Bernacchi et al. (2001).”
• Rubisco specificity factor tends to be larger in plant species from drier habitats and in species with persistent leaves (2005, background): “Current models of leaf photosynthesis assume constant values among C3 plants (Long & Bernacchi 2003) or derive them indirectly from gas exchange measurements (Bernacchi et al. 2001).”
• Desert dogma revisited: coupling of stomatal conductance and photosynthesis in the desert shrub, Larrea tridentata (2002, methodology): “ Bernacchi et al. (2001) found that R25 varied between plants and that Γ25 was approximately constant at 42·75 p.p.m).”
• Physiology and molecular biology of stress tolerance in plants (2006, methodology): “By applying the Farquhar model of photosynthesis (Farquhar et al., 1980) and temperature responses of the model parameters (Bernacchi et al., 2001, 2002, 2003) it was shown that rubisco activity could not explain the CO 2 - response of leaves at temperatures between 30°C and 40°C (Wise et al.,…”
• Inhibition of photosynthesis by heat stress: the activation state of Rubisco as a limiting factor in photosynthesis. (2004, background): “Changes in Rubisco activation are sometimes regarded as a secondary consequence of other limitations (Sage 1990, Farquhar et al. 2001), and therefore are not incorporated into most models of photosynthesis (Bernacchi et al. 2001).”
• Response of total night‐time respiration to differences in total daily photosynthesis for leaves in a Quercus rubra L. canopy: implications for modelling canopy CO2 exchange (2004, methodology): “The temperature dependence of photosynthesis was incorporated following Bernacchi et al. (2001) using parameter values derived experimentally by Walcroft et al. (1997).”
• Seasonal and diurnal changes in photosynthetic limitation of young sweet orange trees. (2009, methodology): “tions and parameters given by Bernacchi et al. (2001). As suggested by von Caemmerer (2000) and also put into practice by Onoda et al.”
• Comprehending crystalline β-carotene accumulation by comparing engineered cell models and the natural carotenoid-rich system of citrus (2011, neutral): “9 μmol mol–1 at 25 °C) derived in vivo by Bernacchi et al. (2001). Q is the incident quantum flux density, ΦPSII is the effective quantum yield of PSII, ξ· is the leaf absorptance determined separately by an integrated sphere (Niinemets et al.”
• In vivo temperature response functions of parameters required to model RuBP-limited photosynthesis (2003, methodology): “Therefore functions predicting variation in Rubisco-limited photosynthesis would be expected to be robust across species and growth conditions (Bernacchi et al. 2001); nevertheless clear thermal adaptation is seen when responses of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis for dif-”