Response of total night‐time respiration to differences in total daily photosynthesis for leaves in a Quercus rubra L. canopy: implications for modelling canopy CO2 exchange

By D. Whitehead, K. Griffin, M. Turnbull, D. Tissue, V. Engel, K. Brown, W. Schuster, A. Walcroft. 2004

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98c9c2e8410d986903e492eee35b26dc7e75d469

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Root respiration in temperate mountain grasslands differing in land use (2006, background): “However, there is conflicting evidence concerning such a possible relationship under field conditions (Atkin et al., 2000b; McCutchan & Monson, 2001; Vose & Ryan, 2002; Whitehead et al., 2004).”
Estimation of daytime ecosystem respiration to determine gross primary production of a mountain meadow (2005, background): “Another source of uncertainty is due to the dependence of respiration on the substrate pool size, reflected for example in comparatively lower nighttime leaf respiration rates following reduced carbon uptakes during the previous day (Whitehead et al., 2004) or a decline in leaf respiration during th”
Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. (2009, background): “This is consistent with the observation that all other factors which increase diurnal carbon gain and foliar carbohydrate content are also reported to stimulate night-time respiration (Azcón-Bieto and Osmond, 1983; Dewar et al., 1999; Whitehead et al., 2004).”
Coupling of respiration, nitrogen, and sugars underlies convergent temperature acclimation in Pinus banksiana across wide‐ranging sites and populations (2008, background): “…2008 The Authors Journal compilation r 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Global Change Biology, 14, 782–797 particularly with regard to constraining the ratio of respiration to photosynthesis in leaves and plants grown in various environments (Amthor, 2000; Gifford, 2003; Whitehead et al., 2004).”
Age‐related decline of stand biomass accumulation is primarily due to mortality and not to reduction in NPP associated with individual tree physiology, tree growth or stand structure in a Quercus‐dominated forest (2012, methodology): “The one-dimensional, multilayer model NEEMo was used to assess the age effect on annual photosynthesis and respiration of the canopy for each stand in the chronosequence (see Appendix S1 and Table S4 for a brief description; Whitehead et al. 2004a,b).”