Andrew Pullin

Global and Planetary Change · 2002–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 16 papers; trusts 9 researchers and is trusted by 59 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Global and Planetary Change — 48 citations into it
• Ecology — 43 citations into it
• Statistics and Probability — 18 citations into it; #1,607 of 12,932 by trust here, #1,457 by citations
• Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis — 16 citations into it; #557 of 1,398 by trust here, #165 by citations
• Ecological Modeling — 9 citations into it; #140 of 2,530 by trust here, #245 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 9 citations into it; #1,321 of 22,756 by trust here, #1,293 by citations

Whom Andrew Pullin trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. W. J. Sutherland
2. James Thomas
3. G. Stewart
4. P. Seddon
5. Sandy Oliver

Who trusts Andrew Pullin overall

1. S. Cooke
2. D. Spear
3. Neal R Haddaway
4. Mallika Sardeshpande
5. Dominique David-Chavez
6. T. Kuuluvainen
7. Nimmi Seoraj-Pillai
8. Kai Ma Chan
9. Rebecca K. Smith
10. A. Teeffelen

Papers from Andrew Pullin's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Andrew Pullin trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Conservation and Development: Evidence from Thai Protected Areas
2. Estimating the Impacts of Bolivia's Protected Areas on Poverty (Social Science Research Network)
3. How effective are European agri‐environment schemes in conserving and promoting biodiversity?
4. Post‐war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain
5. What do conservation biologists publish
6. Effects of marine reserves on adjacent fisheries. (Science)
7. An assessment of the published results of animal relocations
8. THE IMPACT OF MARINE RESERVES: DO RESERVES WORK AND DOES RESERVE SIZE MATTER?
9. The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting With Nature (Psychology Science)
10. Extinction vulnerability in marine populations

Their papers

• ROSES RepOrting standards for Systematic Evidence Syntheses: pro forma, flow-diagram and descriptive summary of the plan and conduct of environmental systematic reviews and systematic maps (2018) — 729 citations
• Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare (2012) — 280 citations
• Human well-being impacts of terrestrial protected areas (2012) — 219 citations
• Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management (2006) — 1,054 citations
• The need for evidence-based conservation. (2004) — 1,822 citations
• A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments (2010) — 1,860 citations
• Evaluating the biological effectiveness of fully and partially protected marine areas (2013) — 141 citations
• A Meta-Analysis of Threatened Plant Reintroductions from across the Globe (2012) — 120 citations
• Is nest predator exclusion an effective strategy for enhancing bird populations (2011) — 106 citations
• Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making. (2010) — 619 citations
• Bias and dispersal in the animal reintroduction literature (2010) — 90 citations
• The relative importance of grazing stock type and grazing intensity for conservation of mesotrophic ‘old meadow’ pasture (2008) — 87 citations
• The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK (2006) — 491 citations
• Drafting a Conservation Blueprint – a practitioner’s guide to planning for biodiversity (2005) — 121 citations
• Conservation Biology: Protecting species. II. Ex situ conservation and reintroduction (2002) — 92 citations
• Persistence of species in a fragmented urban landscape: the importance of dispersal ability and habitat availability for grassland butterflies (2002) — 153 citations