K. Malterud
General Health Professions · 2001–2021
A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 41 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- General Health Professions — 14 citations into it; #181 of 4,781 by trust here, #906 by citations
- Statistics and Probability — 12 citations into it
- Education — 7 citations into it; #516 of 11,309 by trust here, #1,564 by citations
- Sociology and Political Science — 6 citations into it; #1,138 of 22,756 by trust here, #3,584 by citations
Whom K. Malterud trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- U. H. Graneheim
- Kathy Charmaz
- J. Morse
- B. Lundman
- G. Guest
- J. Brocki
- M. Mason
- Amedeo Giorgi
- Trisha Greenhalgh
- J. Webster
Who trusts K. Malterud overall
- Bongkosh Rittichainuwat
- Claire Peugeot Petitmengin
- Eleanor McLellan
- Nirbhay N. Singh
- S. Munro
- U. Isik
- Suphaporn Rattanaphinanchai
- L. Hallberg
- P. Salmon
- Nathan Crilly
Papers from K. Malterud's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers K. Malterud trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. (Nurse Education Today)
- Constructing grounded theory : a practical guide through qualitative analysis
- Evaluative Criteria for Qualitative Research in Health Care: Controversies and Recommendations (Annals of Family Medicine)
- How Many Interviews Are Enough?
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (British medical journal)
- Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review (MIS Q.)
- Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. (Social Science & Medicine (1967))
- ‘Clarity bordering on stupidity’: where’s the quality in systematic review?
- RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses (BMC Medicine)
- Finding what works in health care : standards for systematic reviews
Their papers
- Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines (2001) — 5,225 citations
- Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies (2016) — 10,102 citations
- Systematic text condensation: A strategy for qualitative analysis (2012) — 2,175 citations
- Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018) — 1,072 citations
- Information power: Sample content and size in qualitative studies. (2021) — 100 citations
- It is hard work behaving as a credible patient: encounters between women with chronic pain and their doctors. (2003) — 655 citations