Finding what works in health care : standards for systematic reviews

By J. Eden, Laura A. Levit, Alfred O. Berg, Sally C. Morton. 2011

1,163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b7c3c117526e73710945d5703f7a870bc3e3458

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. David Moher
2. Matthew J. Page
3. Larissa Shamseer
4. L. Stewart
5. Tianjing Li
6. J. Tetzlaff
7. Luke A. McGuinness
8. Patrick M. M. Bossuyt

Citations in the corpus

• Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada (2015, methodology): “The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Institute of Medicine Standards for Systematic Review recommend incorporating grey literature in systematic reviews [2, 4].”
• Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity. (2013, background): “016 assess, and summarize the findings of similar but separate studies’’ [1].”