I. Diener

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · 2011–2016

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 0 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Papers from I. Diener's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers I. Diener trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. (Physical Therapy)
  2. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. (Australian Journal of Physiotherapy)
  3. The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  4. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (British medical journal)
  5. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11‐point numerical pain rating scale (Pain)
  6. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. (Health Technology Assessment)
  7. Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. (Journal of Applied Measurement)
  8. Principles of multilevel modelling. (International Journal of Epidemiology)
  9. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. (New England Journal of Medicine)
  10. Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: A randomized controlled trial. Celecoxib Long-term… (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))

Their papers