Marie-Pierre Gagnon

General Health Professions · 2003–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 8 papers; trusts 6 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• General Health Professions — 51 citations into it; #2,277 of 4,781 by trust here, #1,174 by citations
• Statistics and Probability — 22 citations into it; #8,407 of 12,932 by trust here, #6,310 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 19 citations into it
• Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health — 18 citations into it
• Health Information Management — 11 citations into it
• Education — 7 citations into it
• Human-Computer Interaction — 5 citations into it

Whom Marie-Pierre Gagnon trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Fred D. Davis
2. James G. Anderson
3. Pierre Pluye
4. Alan Bryman
5. Camille Gagné
6. David Moher
7. France Légaré
8. Julian P. T. Higgins
9. Carrie McGinn
10. R. Burke Johnson

Who trusts Marie-Pierre Gagnon overall

1. Quan Nha Hong
2. J. Ross
3. Phillipa McKeering
4. Pierre Pluye
5. Carrie McGinn
6. J. V. van Gemert-Pijnen

Papers from Marie-Pierre Gagnon's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Marie-Pierre Gagnon trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology
2. Modeling patients' acceptance of provider-delivered e-health. (JAMIA Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association)
3. Social, ethical and legal barriers to E-health (Int. J. Medical Informatics)
4. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done?
5. Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies
6. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field (Journal of Health Services Research and Policy)
7. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. (Patient Education and Counseling)
8. Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. (Health Affairs)
9. A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. (International Journal of Nursing Studies)
10. Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research

Their papers

• A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. (2009) — 1,027 citations
• Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study. (2019) — 817 citations
• The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers (2018) — 3,722 citations
• m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review (2016) — 579 citations
• Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. (2012) — 791 citations
• Systematic Review of Factors Influencing the Adoption of Information and Communication Technologies by Healthcare Professionals (2012) — 604 citations
• Comparison of user groups' perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review (2011) — 403 citations
• An adaptation of the theory of interpersonal behaviour to the study of telemedicine adoption by physicians (2003) — 308 citations