Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field

By N. Mays, Catherine Pope, J. Popay. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 2005

1,415 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9bf3669722857e812c66da3ed6262b6489b48892

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Research synthesis in software engineering: A tertiary study (2011, methodology): “A SR directed at knowledge support will typically bring together and synthesize research evidence on a particular topic, while a SR aimed at decision support will be more speciﬁc and include analytical tasks to help make a decision within a particular context [35].”
A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. (2009, background): “…and Fisher, 2006; Gaber, 2000; EPPI-Centre, 2007), and different strategies for conducting MSRs were proposed in nursing (Forbes and Griffiths, 2002), health administration (Mays et al., 2005; Sandelowski et al., 2007), health promotion (Harden et al., 2004) and public health (Pawson et al., 2005).”
Mixed methods research synthesis: definition, framework, and potential (2011, neutral): “certain topic has been recognized (Chalmers et al. 2002; Mays et al. 2005).”
Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence (2017, methodology): “Various synthesis methods have been developed over the past decade [13, 32, 33, 43].”
RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews (2013, neutral): “’ but to illuminate and clarify a complex topic area and highlight the strengths and limitations of different research approaches to that topic [4].”
The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review (2015, background): “Mays, Pope, and Popay (2005) suggest that a scoping review is an effective means of highlighting the relevant literature to the researcher, with the aim of rapid mapping of key concepts underpinning a research area.”
Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies (2016, positive): “Qualitative syntheses can aid our understanding of how complex interventions are embedded into daily routine, which can help to inform health policy and clinical practice [19, 20].”