S. Armstrong

Education · with Bromberger · 2011

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Education — 10 citations into it

Whom S. Armstrong trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Richard E. Mayer
2. R. Burke Johnson
3. Sue Bloxham *

Papers from S. Armstrong's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers S. Armstrong trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Differing perceptions in the feedback process
2. Improving Students' Learning by Developing their Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Processes
3. Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses
4. The Use of Exemplars and Formative Feedback when Using Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment
5. The quality of guidance and feedback to students
6. Understanding the rules of the game: marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students' conceptions of assessment
7. Secondary school students' conceptions of assessment and feedback
8. Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
9. Learning and Instruction
10. Teaching and learning (Emergency Medicine Journal)

Their papers

• Constructive guidance and feedback for learning: the usefulness of exemplars, marking sheets and different types of feedback in a first year law subject (2011) — 102 citations