K. Button

Statistics and Probability · 2013–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 3 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom K. Button trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. John P. A. Ioannidis

Who trusts K. Button overall

  1. Daniël Lakens
  2. Andrew Gelman
  3. Björn Brembs
  4. Thomas S. Redick
  5. Shravan Vasishth
  6. Anders Eklund
  7. Daniyal Rajput
  8. M. Melby‐Lervåg
  9. Kyle Mahowald
  10. G. Escriva-Boulley

Papers from K. Button's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers K. Button trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (PLoS ONE)
  2. Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
  3. HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known
  4. F1000Prime recommendation of False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.
  5. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
  6. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)
  7. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  8. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity (Statistics in Medicine)
  9. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results
  10. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

Their papers