M. Boccaccini

Clinical Psychology · 2008–2009

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Clinical Psychology — 16 citations into it
• Sociology and Political Science — 15 citations into it

Whom M. Boccaccini trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. R. Wollert
2. C. F. Roberts
3. H. Barbaree

Who trusts M. Boccaccini overall

1. Tess Neal

Papers from M. Boccaccini's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers M. Boccaccini trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Evaluating the Predictive Accuracy of Six Risk Assessment Instruments for Adult Sex Offenders
2. STATIC-99 Coding Rules Revised - 2003
3. What Tests Are Acceptable for Use in Forensic Evaluations? A Survey of Experts
4. Risk for Criminal Recidivism: The Role of Psychopathy.
5. Profiles of Psychopathy in Incarcerated Sexual Offenders
6. Dimensions Associated with Assessments of Sex Offender Recidivism Risk
7. Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R) Technical Paper: Development, Validation, and Recommended Risk Level Cut Scores
8. LOW BASE RATES LIMIT EXPERT CERTAINTY WHEN CURRENT ACTUARIALS ARE USED TO IDENTIFY SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS An Application of Bayes's Theorem
9. SPSS 16.0 Statistical Procedures Companion
10. Improving Risk Assessments for Sex Offenders: A Comparison of Three Actuarial Scales (Law and Human Behavior)

Their papers

• Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation? (2009) — 183 citations
• DO SOME EVALUATORS REPORT CONSISTENTLY HIGHER OR LOWER PCL-R SCORES THAN OTHERS? Findings From a Statewide Sample of Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations (2008) — 111 citations