STATIC-99 Coding Rules Revised - 2003

By Andrew Harris, Amy Phenix, R. K. Hanson, D. Thornton, A. Harris. 2003

292 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/75ff3d5be43dd7cdda58f3c7b6068b62ef05bb2d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. L. Helmus
2. G. Willis
3. R. K. Hanson
4. D. Murrie
5. D. Thornton
6. R. Wollert
7. Jodi L. Viljoen
8. A. Harris

Citations in the corpus

• Assessment of Community Reintegration Planning for Sex Offenders (2009, result): “The accuracy of this model in predicting recidivism (AUC = .71) was in the same range as that obtained using static risk models (e.g., Barbaree, Seto, Langton, & Peacock, 2001; G. T. Harris et al., 2003).”
• Absolute Recidivism Rates Predicted By Static-99R and Static-2002R Sex Offender Risk Assessment Tools Vary Across Samples (2012, methodology): “…2009), typically using statistics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve or Cohen’s d, we were able to identify only two studies that explicitly examined the stability of the Static-99 recidivism estimates, with mixed results (Doren, 2004; G. T. Harris et al., 2003).”
• Primer on Risk Assessment and the Statistics Used to Evaluate Its Accuracy (2017, background): “For example, in 2009, there were at least 63 studies examining the discrimination of Static-99 (summarized in Hanson & Morton-Bourgon, 2009) but only two studies examined its calibration (Doren, 2004; G. T. Harris et al., 2003).”
• Indirect Assessment of Cognitions of Child Sexual Abusers With the Implicit Association Test (2007, unknown): “Scoring followed the Static-99 coding rules (Harris et al., 2003).”
• LOW BASE RATES LIMIT EXPERT CERTAINTY WHEN CURRENT ACTUARIALS ARE USED TO IDENTIFY SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS An Application of Bayes's Theorem (2006, methodology): “…the age-wise recidivism rate for those in their mid-fifties is .087, the long-term recidivism rate for those with Static-99 scores of 4 or less is .191 (Harris et al., 2003), and the long-term recidivism rate for all sex offenders in the Static-99 developmental sample is .25 (Harris et al., 2003).”
• Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation? (2009, background): “Harris, Phenix, Hanson, and Thorton (2003; revised scoring procedures) reported an ICC of .”
• Assessment of Reoffense Risk in Adolescents Who Have Committed Sexual Offenses (2009, methodology): “…REOFFENSE RISK 989 (n = 128) because research has suggested that there may be important developmental differences between these age groups (e.g., Cauffman & Steinberg, 2000) and because the Static-99 guidelines note that this tool may have some utility for older adolescents (Harris et al., 2003).”