Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool-Revised (MnSOST-R) Technical Paper: Development, Validation, and Recommended Risk Level Cut Scores

By D. Epperson, J. Kaul, S. Huot, Robin Goldman. 2003

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Patterns of criminal achievement in sexual offending: Unravelling the “successful” sex offender (2011, background): “…having alcohol and/or drug-related problems, showing a lengthy criminal record, criminally versatile, using violence in the commission of sex crime, while targeting extrafamilial or stranger victims (e.g., Epperson et al., 2003; Hanson & Thornton, 2000; Hanson & Harris, 2000; Quinsey et al., 1998).”
Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation? (2009, background): “Indeed, the most recent MnSOST–R technical paper (Epperson et al., 2003) offers more detailed information than is typically available regarding rater agreement for ARAIs:”
The psychological assessment of risk for crime and violence. (2009, methodology): “org) is by far the most commonly used risk tool for sexual offenders, followed by the SVR-20, the Minnesota Sex Offender Screening Tool–Revised (MnSOST-R; Epperson, Kaul, Huot, Goldman, & Alexander, 2003) and the Sex Offender Risk Appraisal Guide (SORAG; Quinsey, Harris, et al,, 2006).”