Daniel J. Simons

Cognitive Neuroscience · 2000–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 5 researchers and is trusted by 28 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Daniel J. Simons trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Harold Pashler
  2. Shawn C. Green
  3. Daphne Bavelier
  4. Karlene K. Ball
  5. Thomas S. Redick
  6. Torkel Klingberg
  7. C. Shawn Green
  8. Herbert H. Clark
  9. Amit X. Garg
  10. Walter R. Boot

Who trusts Daniel J. Simons overall

  1. Catherine S. Ames
  2. A. Hollingworth
  3. Victor A. F. Lamme
  4. S. Fletcher‐Watson
  5. Robin Hunicke
  6. Max H. Bazerman
  7. Mark Rubin
  8. Jeremy M. Wolfe
  9. J. Henderson
  10. Francesca Gino

Papers from Daniel J. Simons's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Daniel J. Simons trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Computerized training of working memory in children with ADHD--a randomized, controlled trial. (Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry)
  2. Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
  3. Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined (Perspectives on Psychological Science)
  4. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis (Psychonomic Bulletin & Review)
  5. No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. (Journal of experimental psychology. General)
  6. Familiarity and visual change detection
  7. Playing an Action Video Game Reduces Gender Differences in Spatial Cognition (Psychology Science)
  8. Neural deficits in children with dyslexia ameliorated by behavioral remediation: Evidence from functional MRI (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  9. Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  10. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (Nature Reviews Neuroscience)

Their papers