Can Stereotype Threat Explain the Gender Gap in Mathematics Performance and Achievement?

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Stereotype manipulation effects on math and spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. (2016, background): “Important research questions remain to be answered as, like Nguyen and Ryan's (2008) and Stoet and Geary (2012), Picho et al.’s meta-analysis only included female samples.”
Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality (2015, background): “…stable for at least the first decade of the 21st century raises questions regarding the efficacy of the interventions that have been used thus far (Stoet & Geary, 2012), whether the interventions focus on the right segment of girls (closing the overall gap requires interventions with the highest…”
Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done? (2020, background): “The studies in question include several meta-analyses (Flore & Wicherts, 2015; Stoet & Geary, 2012), a number of large, pre-registered replications (Finnigan & Corker, 2016; Flore et al., 2019) and an analysis of 5.5 million chess games played in international tournaments, which found that women’s…”