S. Gibson

Obesity Reviews · with Ashwell · 2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Whom S. Gibson trusts

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. M. Ashwell (in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health)

Papers from S. Gibson's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers S. Gibson trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
  2. A systematic review of waist-to-height ratio as a screening tool for the prediction of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: 0·5 could be a suitable global boundary value (Nutrition research reviews)
  3. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American… (Circulation)
  4. Comparisons of waist circumferences measured at 4 sites. (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition)
  5. General and abdominal adiposity and risk of death in Europe. (New England Journal of Medicine)
  6. Six reasons why the waist-to-height ratio is a rapid and effective global indicator for health risks of obesity and how its use could simplify the international public health message on obesity (International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition)
  7. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey (British medical journal)
  8. Waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio are better predictors of cardiovascular disease risk factors in children than body mass index (International Journal of Obesity)
  9. Waist circumference and not body mass index explains obesity-related health risk. (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition)
  10. Fasting serum glucose level and cancer risk in Korean men and women. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))

Their papers