Waist‐to‐height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta‐analysis
By M. Ashwell, P. Gunn, S. Gibson. Obesity Reviews, 2012
1,811 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0335a41a805cd7ab37c046ca1197eff32853e91f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- T. Unger
- C. Borghi
- M. Schlaich
- F. Charchar
- N. Poulter
- D. Prabhakaran
- M. Bou Zerdan
- Y. Bouferraa
Citations in the corpus
- Metabolic Syndrome: Updates on Pathophysiology and Management in 2021 (2022, positive): “Several studies later on have shown that waist-to-height ratio was a better screening tool than waist circumference [14,15].”
- 2020 International Society of Hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines. (2020, neutral): “5 is recommended for all populations [53,54].”
- 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines. (2020, positive): “5 is recommended for all populations [53,54].”
- A New Body Shape Index Predicts Mortality Hazard Independently of Body Mass Index (2012, background): “Our work also follows on findings that dividing WC by height increases its ability to predict cardiometabolic risk factors [32–35].”