M. Ashwell
Obesity Reviews · 2005–2012
A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 0 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Whom M. Ashwell trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts M. Ashwell overall
Papers from M. Ashwell's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers M. Ashwell trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American… (Circulation)
- Comparisons of waist circumferences measured at 4 sites. (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition)
- Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey (British medical journal)
- Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
- A systematic review of waist-to-height ratio as a screening tool for the prediction of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: 0·5 could be a suitable global boundary value (Nutrition research reviews)
- General and abdominal adiposity and risk of death in Europe. (New England Journal of Medicine)
- Six reasons why the waist-to-height ratio is a rapid and effective global indicator for health risks of obesity and how its use could simplify the international public health message on obesity (International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition)
- Waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio are better predictors of cardiovascular disease risk factors in children than body mass index (International Journal of Obesity)
- Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. (Obesity Reviews)
- Waist circumference and not body mass index explains obesity-related health risk. (American Journal of Clinical Nutrition)
Their papers
- Waist‐to‐height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta‐analysis (2012) — 1,811 citations
- A systematic review of waist-to-height ratio as a screening tool for the prediction of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: 0·5 could be a suitable global boundary value (2010) — 1,345 citations
- A study of central fatness using waist-to-height ratios in UK children and adolescents over two decades supports the simple message – ‘keep your waist circumference to less than half your height’ (2006) — 670 citations
- Six reasons why the waist-to-height ratio is a rapid and effective global indicator for health risks of obesity and how its use could simplify the international public health message on obesity (2005) — 1,040 citations