Merrick Zwarenstein

General Health Professions · 2003–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 8 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Merrick Zwarenstein trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Peter M. Rothwell

Who trusts Merrick Zwarenstein overall

  1. Amit G. Singal
  2. David Moher
  3. K. F. Schulz
  4. Douglas G. Altman

Papers from Merrick Zwarenstein's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Merrick Zwarenstein trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)
  2. External validity of randomised controlled trials: "to whom do the results of this trial apply?".
  3. Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. (British medical journal)
  4. A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. (New England Journal of Medicine)
  5. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (British medical journal)
  6. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
  7. Principles of multilevel modelling. (International Journal of Epidemiology)
  8. Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: A randomized controlled trial. Celecoxib Long-term… (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
  9. Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. (New England Journal of Medicine)
  10. What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews? (British medical journal)

Their papers