John B. Loomis

Economics and Econometrics · 2000–2011

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 9 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom John B. Loomis trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. K. Blumenschein
  2. Glenn W. Harrison
  3. Glenn C. Blomquist
  4. A. Caplan
  5. John A. List
  6. Magnus Johannesson
  7. Laura O. Taylor
  8. G. Parsons
  9. N. Horn

Who trusts John B. Loomis overall

  1. Richard T. Carson
  2. Natalia López-Mosquera
  3. Sheila M. Olmstead

Papers from John B. Loomis's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers John B. Loomis trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Eliciting Willingness to Pay Without Bias: Evidence from a Field Experiment
  2. What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?
  3. Chapter 81 Experimental Evidence on the Existence of Hypothetical Bias in Value Elicitation Methods
  4. Neoclassical Theory Versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace
  5. Estimating Willingness to Pay for Curbside Recycling with Detection and Mitigation of Hypothetical Bias
  6. Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auctions for sportscards
  7. Does market experience eliminate market anomalies
  8. Explaining Disparities between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values: Further Investigation Using Meta-Analysis
  9. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47
  10. Alternative Non-market Value-Elicitation Methods: Are the Underlying Preferences the Same?

Their papers