Mariska M. G. Leeflang
Annals of Internal Medicine · 2008–2020
A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 0 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Whom Mariska M. G. Leeflang trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts Mariska M. G. Leeflang overall
Papers from Mariska M. G. Leeflang's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Mariska M. G. Leeflang trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (Annals of Internal Medicine)
- A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations (Statistics in Medicine)
- Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review (PLoS ONE)
- STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (BMJ Open)
- Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it?☆
- PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (PLoS Medicine)
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online])
- Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data (Statistics in Medicine)
- Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
- Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. (British medical journal)
Their papers
- Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement (2018) — 2,772 citations
- Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2008) — 876 citations
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020) — 638 citations
- Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 (2020) — 807 citations
- Rapid, point‐of‐care antigen and molecular‐based tests for diagnosis of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection (2020) — 1,048 citations
- Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2013) — 1,201 citations
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011) — 3,790 citations