Delphi methodology in health research: how to do it?☆

By Esmé G Trevelyan, N. Robinson. 2015

627 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f7272f3f49bce4e4a3ad1edac03817b78e7ecc9b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. David Moher

In Statistics and Probability

1. Patrick M. M. Bossuyt
2. David Moher
3. A. Rutjes
4. Mariska M. G. Leeflang
5. Lotty Hooft
6. B. Thombs
7. Douglas G. Altman
8. K. F. Schulz

Citations in the corpus

• Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement (2018, methodology): “Delphi Process A 3-round Delphi process was held between December 2016 and March 2017 in which all members of the PRISMA diagnostic test accuracy group were invited to participate.(20,21) This modified Delphi process has been used previously for similar work such as Risk of Bias in Systematic Review”