Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests.

By J. Deeks. British medical journal, 2001

1,216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Statistics and Probability, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a5e2055f8364f4c083ec66db6963a0ce9b98921

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

1. E. Amir
2. Jennifer J. Knox
3. T. Walter
4. A. Horgan
5. R. Harbord
6. P. Whiting
7. Patrick M. M. Bossuyt
8. Rob J. P. M. Scholten

In Statistics and Probability

1. R. Harbord
2. P. Whiting
3. R. Riley
4. J. Sterne
5. J. Deeks
6. Johannes B Reitsma
7. Patrick M. M. Bossuyt
8. Matthias Egger

In Surgery

1. J. Sterne
2. E. Amir
3. Jennifer J. Knox
4. T. Walter
5. A. Horgan
6. P. Whiting
7. R. Harbord
8. Patrick M. M. Bossuyt

Citations in the corpus

• Adjuvant therapy in the treatment of biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012, methodology): “Differences between the subgroups were assessed using methods described by Deeks et al.12 No corrections were made for multiple comparisons.”
• The role of the amygdala in emotional processing: a quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. (2008, background): “, variance, sample size), is not taken into account (Deeks, 2001).”
• Association of Hemoglobin A1c with Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality in Adults: The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer in Norfolk (2004, methodology): “In interpreting recent clinical trial data in a position statement, the American Diabetes Association stated that “the role of hyperglycemia in cardiovascular complications is still unclear” (12).”
• A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. (2006, background): “…estimate of the test accuracy and clinical value based on all present evidence, after assessing the quality of the included studies and evaluating the variation in findings among the studies (Irwig et al ., 1995; Deeks, 2001; Deville et al ., 2002; Honest and Khan, 2002; Glas et al ., 2003).”
• Metandi: Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Using Hierarchical Logistic Regression (2009, background): “There is increasing interest in systematic reviews and meta-analyses of data from diagnostic accuracy studies (Deeks 2001b; Devillé et al. 2002; Tatsioni et al. 2005; Gluud and Gluud 2005; Mallett et al. 2006; Gatsonis and Paliwal 2006), which presents many additional challenges compared to more…”