Lynette Chow-Martin

2002

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Whom Lynette Chow-Martin trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. D. Steffensmeier
2. W. Grove
3. Stephen Demuth

Who trusts Lynette Chow-Martin overall

1. Richard A. Berk
2. Jiaming Zeng
3. Yuan-yuan Liu
4. Justin Bleich

Papers from Lynette Chow-Martin's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Lynette Chow-Martin trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Ethnicity and Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is Punished More Harshly? (American Sociological Review)
2. Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy.
3. Guideline-Based Justice: Prediction and Racial Minorities
4. A Classification Tree Approach to the Development of Actuarial Violence Risk Assessment Tools
5. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart
6. DOWNWARD DEPARTURES FOR SERIOUS VIOLENT OFFENDERS: LOCAL COURT “CORRECTIONS” TO PENNSYLVANIA'S SENTENCING GUIDELINES*
7. RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN SENTENCING DEPARTURES ACROSS MODES OF CONVICTION
8. GENDER, STRUCTURAL DISADVANTAGE, AND URBAN CRIME: DO MACROSOCIAL VARIABLES ALSO EXPLAIN FEMALE OFFENDING RATES?*
9. Recent Developments and New Directions in Sentencing Research
10. TRENDS IN THE GENDER GAP IN VIOLENCE: REEVALUATING NCVS AND OTHER EVIDENCE*

Their papers

• A Multiple Models Approach to Assessing Recidivism Risk (2002)