B. Swire‐Thompson
Sociology and Political Science · 2019–2020
A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 6 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Sociology and Political Science — 63 citations into it; #17,044 of 22,756 by trust here, #6,224 by citations
- Artificial Intelligence — 15 citations into it; #34,509 of 35,345 by trust here, #15,236 by citations
- Cognitive Neuroscience — 10 citations into it
- General Health Professions — 6 citations into it
- General Decision Sciences — 5 citations into it
- Statistics and Probability — 5 citations into it
Whom B. Swire‐Thompson trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Dan Kahan
- Ullrich K. H. Ecker
- Gerd Gigerenzer
- Stephan Lewandowsky
- Miriam McMullan
- John T. Jost
- Leticia Bode
- Jonah A. Berger
- Shelia R. Cotten
- Cameron D. Norman
Who trusts B. Swire‐Thompson overall
Papers from B. Swire‐Thompson's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers B. Swire‐Thompson trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- The Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence
- Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
- The spread of true and false news online
- Fast and frugal heuristics: The tools of bounded rationality
- Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation (Psychology Science)
- Motivated Rejection of Science
- When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion
- The Role of Familiarity in Correcting Inaccurate Information
- Ideological Asymmetries and the Essence of Political Psychology
- Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence (PLoS ONE)
Their papers
- Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election (2019) — 1,501 citations
- Public Health and Online Misinformation: Challenges and Recommendations. (2019) — 907 citations
- They Might Be a Liar But They’re My Liar: Source Evaluation and the Prevalence of Misinformation (2019) — 100 citations
- The Debunking Handbook 2020 (2020) — 188 citations