B. Als-Nielsen

Statistics and Probability · 2003–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom B. Als-Nielsen trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. David Moher
  2. Douglas G. Altman

Papers from B. Als-Nielsen's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers B. Als-Nielsen trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  2. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
  3. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (British medical journal)
  4. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (Health Technology Assessment)
  5. Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies
  6. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Supplements for Primary and Secondary Prevention: Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant
  7. Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. (Controlled Clinical Trials)
  8. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. (New England Journal of Medicine)
  9. Comparison of Weight-Loss Diets with Different Compositions of Fat, Protein, and Carbohydrates (New England Journal of Medicine)
  10. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. (New England Journal of Medicine)

Their papers