Jessica M. Craig

Clinical Psychology · 2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 4 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Jessica M. Craig trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. James Jaccard
  2. Michael T. Baglivio
  3. R. Anda
  4. David P. Farrington
  5. C. Kubrin
  6. Alex R. Piquero
  7. Michael R. Gottfredson
  8. Eric A. Stewart
  9. V. Felitti
  10. Mark Lipsey

Who trusts Jessica M. Craig overall

  1. A. Fagan

Papers from Jessica M. Craig's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Jessica M. Craig trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Building a framework for global surveillance of the public health implications of adverse childhood experiences. (American Journal of Preventive Medicine)
  2. Trauma changes everything: examining the relationship between adverse childhood experiences and serious, violent and chronic juvenile offenders. (International Journal of Child Abuse & Neglect)
  3. Risk, promotive, and protective factors in youth offending: Results from the Cambridge study in delinquent development
  4. Examining the Validity of a Juvenile Offending Risk Assessment Instrument Across Gender and Race/Ethnicity
  5. The interrelatedness of multiple forms of childhood abuse, neglect, and household dysfunction. (International Journal of Child Abuse & Neglect)
  6. The assessment of risk to recidivate among a juvenile offending population
  7. PREDICTING WHO REOFFENDS: THE NEGLECTED ROLE OF NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT IN RECIDIVISM STUDIES*
  8. The association between adverse childhood experiences and adolescent pregnancy, long-term psychosocial consequences, and fetal death. (Pediatrics)
  9. The Primary Factors that Characterize Effective Interventions with Juvenile Offenders: A Meta-Analytic Overview
  10. Family Structure, Family Processes, and Adolescent Delinquency: The Significance of Parental Absence Versus Parental Gender

Their papers