Louise Crochemore

Water Science and Technology · 2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Louise Crochemore trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Hoshin V. Gupta
  2. B. Schaefli
  3. Florian Pappenberger
  4. Uwe Ehret
  5. A. Ritter
  6. C. Dawson
  7. Keith Beven
  8. E. Zehe
  9. R. Muñoz‐Carpena

Who trusts Louise Crochemore overall

  1. Hilary K. McMillan
  2. Florine Garcia
  3. I. Westerberg

Papers from Louise Crochemore's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Louise Crochemore trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Do Nash values have value?
  2. Series distance – an intuitive metric to quantify hydrograph similarity in terms of occurrence, amplitude and timing of hydrological events
  3. On typical range, sensitivity, and normalization of Mean Squared Error and Nash‐Sutcliffe Efficiency type metrics
  4. Weighted Hamming distance for PUF performance evaluation
  5. A refined index of model performance
  6. Performance evaluation of hydrological models: Statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments
  7. Functional classification and evaluation of hydrographs based on Multicomponent Mapping (Mx)
  8. HydroTest: A web-based toolbox of evaluation metrics for the standardised assessment of hydrological forecasts (Environmental Modelling & Software)
  9. Why hydrological predictions should be evaluated using information theory
  10. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods

Their papers