Weighted Hamming distance for PUF performance evaluation

By A. Sadr, M. Zolfaghari-Nejad. 2013

861 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hardware and Architecture

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7aef352553e7b00e9e39f6fa8a47511e1d23f46b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Wei Sun
2. Chunxia Guo
3. Yunqiang Zhu
4. Shengli Huang

In Hardware and Architecture

1. Wei Sun
2. Chunxia Guo
3. Yunqiang Zhu
4. Shengli Huang

Citations in the corpus

• Comparing expert judgement and numerical criteria for hydrograph evaluation (2015, methodology): “Others have advised standardizing evaluation tools to make published studies more consistent in terms of evaluation (Dawson et al. 2007, Moriasi et al. 2007, Schaefli and Gupta 2007, Reusser et al. 2009, Alexandrov et al. 2011, Ritter and Muñoz-Carpena 2013).”
• Mapping the mean annual precipitation of China using local interpolation techniques (2014, methodology): “Xie et al. (2011) evaluated simple kriging with local means (SKlm), KED, and RK for their performance on estimation of precipitation.”