Comparing expert judgement and numerical criteria for hydrograph evaluation
By Louise Crochemore, Charles Perrin, Vazken Andréassian, Uwe Ehret, S. Seibert, Salvatore Grimaldi, Hoshin V. Gupta, J. Paturel. 2015
75 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3ec07a4a0988017f7a4a3be070fec3e82fbfe64c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
In Global and Planetary Change
In Water Science and Technology
Citations in the corpus
- Which objective function to calibrate rainfall–runoff models for low-flow index simulations? (2017, methodology): “simulated hydrographs, but this technique is subjective, dependent on expert judgement and difficult to reproduce (Chiew et McMahon, 1993 ; Houghton-Carr, 1999 ; Crochemore et al., 2015).”
- Rating curve estimation under epistemic uncertainty (2015, methodology): “…performance measures such as hydrograph evaluation measures that mimic visual interpretation of hydrograph fit (Ehret and Zehe, 2011; Ewen, 2011; Crochemore et al., 2014) and more broadly with the recognition that validation includes both objective and subjective components (Rykiel, 1996).”