The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary

By Eric S. Raymond, Bob Young. 2001

1,061 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ffb442621346dd1894ebba2950db650e742cce40

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption (2016, unknown): “In particular, gaining reputation among likeminded people has been shown to motivate sharing in online communities and open-source projects (Parameswaran & Whinston, 2007; Raymond, 1999).”
The Role of Participation Architecture in Growing Sponsored Open Source Communities (2008, background): “Raymond's stylized typology ( 1999 ) of “The Cathedral and the Bazaar” contrasts the tightly controlled BSD projects with the more open Linux.”
Modeling bug report quality (2007, background): “The assumption is that allowing users to report and potentially help fix bugs improves overall quality [13].”
User Community vs. Producer Innovation Development Efficiency: A First Empirical Study (2013, background): “Further, it may be that the diversity in problem-solving expertise present across a user community of thousands of solvers – what we term “efficiencies of scope” – may trump the depth of expertise of many fewer producer-employed solvers (Raymond, 1999; Jeppesen and Lakhani, 2010).”
Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science (2003, unknown): “The open source project to develop, maintain, and improve this program was led by Eric Raymond (Raymond 1999a).”
How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies (2003, background): “6 The more centralized cooperative efforts such as FreeBSD or Apache — the “cathedral” in the famous typology of Raymond (1999) — provided a more identifiable authority for negotiating alliances.”
Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation (2010, unknown): “Early evidence shows there are ways for producers to thrive by adopting open innovation designs and shifting to profit seeking based on other forms of private advantage, such as lead time, high-quality service, and superior distribution channels (Raymond 1999, von Hippel 2005).”
Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review (2020, background): “Informal and face-to-face communication [3, 39, 173, 214, 265]”
Work Practices and Challenges in Pull-Based Development: The Contributor's Perspective (2014, background): “We found that when contributors want to communicate about a change in the context of pull-based development, the preferred mean is no longer the mailing list, which has been considered the hub of project communication in OSS systems for long time [42].”
Guarding the commons: how community managed software projects protect their work (2003, background): “interests (Raymond, 1999).”
Meta-design: A Framework for the Future of End-User Development (2006, methodology): “For example, open source software systems [ Raymond & Young, 2001 ] often evolve for some time by adding patches, but eventually a new major version must be created that incorporates the patches in a coherent fashion.”
Socialization in an Open Source Software Community: A Socio-Technical Analysis (2005, background): “Of great interest to many, for instance, was the question of individual motivation: for its most ardent proponents the ‘‘free’’ (meaning voluntary and often uncompensated) contribution of OSS participants represents a new alternative to traditional economic systems ( Raymond and Young, 2001 ); other”
Unpaid Crowd Complementors: The Platform Network Effect Mirage (2015, unknown): “This might result in longer-term economic pay-offs in the form, say, of a job offer or such non-economic pay-offs as social status or ego-gratification (e.g., Raymond, 1999; Johnson, 2002; Lerner and Tirole, 2002).”
Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) (2006, methodology): “…of benefits commercial firms could derive from contributing to public OSS development have been explored by various authors (Behlendorf 1999, Hecker 1999, Raymond 1999, Feller and Fitzgerald 2002, Lerner and Tirole 2002, Wichmann 2002, Bonaccorsi and Rossi 2004, Dahlander and Magnusson 2005).”