Modeling bug report quality

By Pieter Hooimeijer, Westley Weimer. International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2007

338 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

It's not a bug, it's a feature: How misclassification impacts bug prediction (2013, background): “The quality of bug reports is frequently topic of research studies [13], [14], [15], [16].”
Towards more accurate retrieval of duplicate bug reports (2011, background): “Hooimeijer and Weimer develop a model to predict bug report quality [23].”
History Driven Program Repair (2016, background): “Many defects, including security-critical defects, remain unaddressed for extensive periods [19], and the resulting impact on the global economy is measured in the billions of dollars annually [48], [10].”
Improving bug triage with bug tossing graphs (2009, background): “Several studies investigated which factors predict the lifetime of bug reports, that is from submission to being closed [4, 19, 21].”
A discriminative model approach for accurate duplicate bug report retrieval (2010, background): “Additionally, Hooimeijer and Weimer suggested a statistics based model to predict the quality of bug reports [10].”
Automated duplicate detection for bug tracking systems (2008, methodology): “These features include the self-reported severity, the relevant operating system, and the number of associated patches or screenshots [6].”