Innovation, collaboration and SMEs internal research capacities

By F. Bougrain, Bernard Haudeville. 2002

595 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff23d3c0e849635fb938db4d223ab04690a98787

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. J. Love
2. M. A. Mansury
3. Jeroen de Jong
4. P. Vermeulen
5. P. Robson
6. Mark Freel
7. L. Klerkx
8. C. Leeuwis

In Strategy and Management

1. J. Love
2. C. Leeuwis
3. M. A. Mansury
4. Jeroen de Jong
5. P. Vermeulen
6. Mark Freel
7. L. Klerkx
8. Stefano Bresciani

Citations in the corpus

• Making sense of innovation by R&D and non-R&D innovators in low technology contexts: a forgotten lesson for policymakers (2011, background): “Some contributions assimilate AC to a firm’s other internal variables such as the existence of a design office (Bougrain and Haudeville, 2002) or the educational and training policy which gives people within organizations the basis to introduce innovation (Lundvall and Nielsen, 1999).”
• Determinants of successful R&D cooperation in Japanese small businesses: The impact of organizational and contractual characteristics (2007, methodology): “Using data of large firms in the research consortia in Japan, Branstetter and Sakakibara (2002) analyze the impact of certain organizational characteristics of consortia (technological proximity and product market proximity of members, level of centralization, diversity of members, etc.). They concl”
• Innovation, cooperation and business performance: Some evidence from Indonesian small food processing cluster (2011, background): “Moreover, SMEs are increasingly dependent on external sources of technical activity because the process which generates new innovations or technology is becoming more complex ( Bougrain and Haudeville, 2002”
• Determinants of Product Innovation in Small Firms (2006, methodology): “We structure the presentation of our fi rm-level innovative practices using three broad categories derived from the literature (cf. Bougrain and Haudeville, 2002; Cooper and Kleinschmidt, 1995; Ernst, 2002; Hadjimanolis, 2000) and will elaborate on each of the variables included in the categories:…”
• Determinants of product innovation in small firms: A Comparison Across Industries (2004, background): “First, one can recognize studies that use broad samples of firms spread through various industries without comparing the results across sectors (e.g., Brouwer and Kleinknecht, 1996; Hadjimanolis, 2000; Bougrain and Haudeville, 2002).”
• Innovation, productivity and growth in US business services: a firm-level analysis (2008, background): “6 that are customer oriented(4) experience an increase in performance (Narver and Slater, 1990; Donaldson, 1993; Bougrain and Haudeville, 2002; Tether, 2002).”
• Balancing multiple interests: embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure (2008, background): “The constraints that have to do with search costs associated with identifying potential transaction partners and difficulties in ex ante evaluation of R&D and KIBS service value are often labelled as an ‘information gap’ (Bougrain and Haudeville, 2002; Izushi, 2003).”
• The nature of SME co-operation and innovation: A multi-scalar and multi-dimensional analysis (2013, unknown): “For instance, in the OECD, innovation policy has shifted from predominantly direct subsidies to individual firms towards funding projects that promote collaborative ties between firms (Bougrain and Haudeville, 2002).”
• Patterns of Technological Innovation in Knowledge‐Intensive Business Services (2006, background): “Indeed, and given the current fashion for innovation networking as policy prescription (Huggins, 2001 ; Bougrain and Haudeville, 2002 ), it is important to recognize that cooperation is not a majority activity.”
• Technological Collaboration in Product Innovation: The Role of Market Competition and Sectoral Technological Intensity (2012, background): “There is a significant body of literature examining the impacts of strategic alliances1 on firm innovation activities and outcomes (Brown and Eisenhardt, 1995; Bougrain and Haudeville, 2002; McGill and Santoro, 2009; Smith et al., 1991).”